|
Post by gmbtempe on Apr 16, 2011 13:19:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by gmbtempe on Apr 16, 2011 13:48:28 GMT -5
The fact that any one golfer "hits it better" with any move makes for no real argument.
If a golfer puts up perfect TrackMan numbers, does he have a dynamic pivot?
These statements are interesting. So are we talking about the theoretical then with a certain golfer?
If a golfer tries the two models and clearly gets better results with one over another isn't that enough to be dynamic for him?
Do you think it matters to Lovemark, or say Tiger with his new pivot, that it might not fit the model of a "dynamic" pivot on some 3d system.
What is the end goal? I thought it was to hit it better, not fit a model?
|
|
|
Post by gmbtempe on Apr 16, 2011 16:55:24 GMT -5
But, Ricky Fowler generates a lot of power with such a move. Alas, even an amateur swing junkie could spot the differences between Fowler and Tempe.
Really? Ya think?
I gotta disagree.
I think Ray Charles could see the difference.
|
|
joec
'88 Apex Redlines
Posts: 161
|
Post by joec on Apr 17, 2011 10:34:54 GMT -5
finney, thanks for the answer.
|
|