Post by Richie3Jack on Jan 11, 2013 9:03:54 GMT -5
From the feedback I've been receiving, everybody likes the new format of 2012 Pro Golf Synopsis. It's a lot easier to decipher and reference.
I've already got 3 planned essays for the 2013 Pro Golf Synopsis. I doubt I will do 7 essays like I did for the 2012 version, but you never know.
I also plan on adding the player's rankings in 'shots from the rough' and 'shots from the fairway/tee box' in the next version as well.
I will also be keeping a closer check to my tournament picks and their odds. As well as the eventual winner, their odds. For each tournament, I will have the players in the event ranked with accordance to how I think they fit statistically to the course at hand. For instance, somebody like Shane Bertsch would likely be a bad fit at Augusta because he hits it so low whereas Bubba may be ranked #1 to win Augusta by the metrics. Then we get to a course like Olympic and Bertsch *could be* ranked better than Bubba according to the metrics. I hope to have an accounting of that for each tournament.
I won't be doing the player rankings for each metric until after the 4th tournament of the season. Too many players get involved in tournaments early in the year that will not qualify statistically, so there's little reason to account for them.
I've also been in some preliminary discussions to do some radio interviews at the PGA Show. I think I'll get squeezed out because it's a last second thing. However, I've also been in discussion about doing some online seminars as well. I'll keep people in touch about them.
3JACK
I've already got 3 planned essays for the 2013 Pro Golf Synopsis. I doubt I will do 7 essays like I did for the 2012 version, but you never know.
I also plan on adding the player's rankings in 'shots from the rough' and 'shots from the fairway/tee box' in the next version as well.
I will also be keeping a closer check to my tournament picks and their odds. As well as the eventual winner, their odds. For each tournament, I will have the players in the event ranked with accordance to how I think they fit statistically to the course at hand. For instance, somebody like Shane Bertsch would likely be a bad fit at Augusta because he hits it so low whereas Bubba may be ranked #1 to win Augusta by the metrics. Then we get to a course like Olympic and Bertsch *could be* ranked better than Bubba according to the metrics. I hope to have an accounting of that for each tournament.
I won't be doing the player rankings for each metric until after the 4th tournament of the season. Too many players get involved in tournaments early in the year that will not qualify statistically, so there's little reason to account for them.
I've also been in some preliminary discussions to do some radio interviews at the PGA Show. I think I'll get squeezed out because it's a last second thing. However, I've also been in discussion about doing some online seminars as well. I'll keep people in touch about them.
3JACK