|
Post by teeace on Jun 5, 2014 14:09:15 GMT -5
Tapio - So your system has found a way to properly collect 3D data involving ball and socket joints? We have alway known where those joints are and how they are moving, but you didn't understand what I said. Those guys who call themselves scientists are telling their opinion about device they have never seen and understand nothing about it. So they are talking out loud about thing they know nothing about.
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jun 5, 2014 14:33:57 GMT -5
Tapio -
Can your system properly collect 3D data of a ball and socket joint?
You are the one talking about a "second fire" in the shoulders so I'm asking if you have shoulder data. Simple yes or no question. Plus, you just went off on AMM about using the words "shoulders" so I presume if you use the word "shoulders" that it truly means the shoulders and corresponding ball and socket joint and not the thorax.
|
|
|
Post by teeace on Jun 5, 2014 14:55:53 GMT -5
Tapio - Can your system properly collect 3D data of a ball and socket joint? You are the one talking about a "second fire" in the shoulders so I'm asking if you have shoulder data. Simple yes or no question. Plus, you just went off on AMM about using the words "shoulders" so I presume if you use the word "shoulders" that it truly means the shoulders and corresponding ball and socket joint and not the thorax. For sure we got shoulder data. Even left and right separately if you need. Rotation speed, lateral speeds, heights, paths, orientations.. lateral and rotational, position... what you need? Can't understand how you ask that when I just posted graph about shoulder rotation speed. But you still didn't understand my comment about those scientists and it was the point of my reply.
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jun 5, 2014 19:25:46 GMT -5
Tapio -
Why you keep posting graphs without any numerical data is beyond me. It detracts from your credibility.
|
|
|
Post by teeace on Jun 6, 2014 0:43:40 GMT -5
Tapio - Why you keep posting graphs without any numerical data is beyond me. It detracts from your credibility. Because 99,999% of people can see all relevant information from that image. If you can't, it's totally your problem.
|
|
|
Post by mikewb280 on Jun 7, 2014 17:36:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by teeace on Jun 8, 2014 2:07:45 GMT -5
Have been laughing now half an hour... you got any idea when it ends??
|
|