|
Post by gmbtempe on Sept 24, 2010 1:04:08 GMT -5
I have no idea if these two methods are actual ways to putt but its a key difference for me.
I am a pretty decent putter but not great. I used to be pretty great at it when I was a kid and before I got more serious.
When I was a kid I had more of a athlete trying to make a play way of playing the entire game and with putting I had a long looping stroke but my singular focus was to hit the ball to a spot. I read the break and figured if it was 6 inches right of the cup to start it thats where I hit it. I never ever figured about making a smooth stroke, SBST, arcing, shoulders, etc. It was all about hitting it to second base so to speak.
Now I am very precise. I line up square, find the line the ball will curve,try to make a on plane stroke with good mechanics. I still make some and probably miss a few less shorter ones.
But I dont seem to make as many and I seem to put less good rolls on it never giving it a chance.
Just rambling I guess but it sured seemed simpler to get the ball in the hole.
|
|
|
Post by Richie3Jack on Sept 24, 2010 8:35:40 GMT -5
For whatever reason, spot putting doesn't work for me. I think in part because I get too discouraged when I miss a putt that hits the spot I am focusing on or even worse, when I miss the spot.
As a kid I used to bowl a lot and bowlers commonly try to find the board next to the dots on the lane and aim at that. That was the best way for me to bowl, but it never really translated to putting. The AimPoint stuff has helped a lot, although I still don't know how to get in the zero point lines. Geoff Mangum just didn a lengthy essay against AimPoint. I'm confident his points are valid, but I don't have the time or money to get putting lessons from Geoff. I think AimPoint provides a very good, easy way to understand reading greens. Geoff's may be more optimal, and by judging Elkington's putting this year since working with Mangum, it probably is.
3JACK
|
|