|
Post by 94monarch on Jun 11, 2012 21:01:46 GMT -5
What is different in the concept of grind on this Ping Eye 2 wedge I have had in a bag in the back of my office than what Edel is doing. I realize Edel has a lot more fitting options, but wouldn't this qualify as a high bounce toward the front with a lot of heel relief? Just curious. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by 94monarch on Jun 11, 2012 21:05:21 GMT -5
sorry the picture is sideways...no clue how to fix that
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jun 11, 2012 21:22:41 GMT -5
The trailing edge relief is similar. It's not a digger grind, maybe a driver grind. However, my driver grind has 22* bounce. What's the grind for a Ping L? 18*??
Don't forget the shafts to match ball flight. You might be able to match your attack angle off the rack, but it's very difficult.
|
|
|
Post by jeffy on Jun 11, 2012 21:53:47 GMT -5
What is different in the concept of grind on this Ping Eye 2 wedge I have had in a bag in the back of my office than what Edel is doing. I realize Edel has a lot more fitting options, but wouldn't this qualify as a high bounce toward the front with a lot of heel relief? Just curious. Yep, and many will argue that's why it was so popular. I remember really liking the performance of my PingZing wedge in the sand but hating to look at it. Mike Adams told me that on tour the lob wedges typically have a lot of bounce, but for some reason the OEMs don't offer it. He said Bob Vokey claimed that "I have nothing to do" with the bounce on the retail lob wedges.
|
|