|
|
Post by Richie3Jack on Jul 12, 2012 13:48:26 GMT -5
Sweet looking irons here.  |
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jul 12, 2012 14:30:39 GMT -5
Why have the CG moved towards the hosel? The CG is still a pinpoint no matter where they move the weight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Richie3Jack on Jul 12, 2012 15:07:39 GMT -5
Move the mass towards the hosel to move it upwards (I'm guessing) to promote a lower ball flight. I just said they look awesome, how they perform is a different story.
3JACK
|
|
|
|
Post by walther on Jul 12, 2012 16:40:59 GMT -5
Pretty sweet overall but the top line looks clunky to me.
w
|
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jul 13, 2012 14:00:37 GMT -5
Wouldn't the best club match the COG to one's AOA?
|
|
|
|
Post by Richie3Jack on Jul 13, 2012 15:01:36 GMT -5
More factors than AoA. Clubhead speed, dynamic loft, etc. Basically matching it to the max height. Really can't do that with clubheads per say so golfers try to do it with shafts. Maybe some gazillionaire could try to do something with clubheads and their swing characteristics by getting some Scratch Golf customs.
3JACK
|
|
|
|
Post by cloran on Jul 17, 2012 10:42:50 GMT -5
They look like flowers.
Add some burn marks on the hosels, lead tape, cracked ferrules, and dripping epoxy please. CloranGolf those things up a bit.
|
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jul 17, 2012 12:42:37 GMT -5
More factors than AoA. Clubhead speed, dynamic loft, etc. Basically matching it to the max height. Really can't do that with clubheads per say so golfers try to do it with shafts. Maybe some gazillionaire could try to do something with clubheads and their swing characteristics by getting some Scratch Golf customs. 3JACK I wouldn't be surprised if the pros have this done for them. At some point the shaft doesn't bring the ballflight down or up so they fool with the place of the COG. Just a hunch. |
|
