|
Post by jeffy on Jan 13, 2013 18:03:31 GMT -5
rj = finney
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jan 13, 2013 18:04:17 GMT -5
You did buckwheat. Post number 25 in your prior thread on this topic in November. 600 is more than 500 if you use simple math. Jeffy's own words: "Depth of field and parallax issues don't factor at all into these simple facts: at the top of the backswing, Sadlowski's hips are at least 50 degrees shut. 17 frames later, the hips are square. That is a rate of rotation of about 530 degrees per second. At impact, 18 frames later, the hips are at least 60 degrees open, a rate of rotation of 600 degrees per second, 13% higher. Is that consistent with a theory that states rotation peaks at hips square and decelerates rapidly after that? No. Falsified." Post number 25: jeffygolf.com/showthread.php?518-....to-impact/page2You even touted Tapio's graphs as proof the hips keep accelerating. You can't even read!!! LOL! You can't subtract. I love it when you go into ignore the facts mode. It shows a lot. Continuos acceleration is bullshit and proven false by AMM3D. Continuous acceleration is Kelvin's turd in his own pocket right now since he came up with this lame idea strictly from video.
|
|
|
Post by jeffy on Jan 13, 2013 18:06:10 GMT -5
You can't even read!!! LOL! You can't subtract. I love it when you go into ignore the facts mode. It shows a lot. Continuos acceleration is bullshit and proven false by AMM3D. Continuous acceleration is Kelvin's turd in his own pocket right now since he came up with this lame idea strictly from video. What does the rate of rotation from midway down UNTIL impact have to do with what happens AFTER impact?
|
|
|
Post by playa on Jan 13, 2013 18:06:23 GMT -5
Also, this: Kelvin and Jeffy never suggested bracing or stalling of the hip rotation (as I have conceded the use of hip acceleration around impact could be more clear or accurate) But, BMan never discouraged hip bracing or stalling. He has shown many examples of good players doing just that. On this issue alone, K/J is vastly different from BM. In my opinion, BM is gradually and insidiously coming out of his old position, owing to K's influence. (shit, if one reads K's stuff to gleam from it, something will eventually rub off, or is it rob off? ) Pretty soon, he will feel comfortable enough to say: I never taught hip bracing and stalling. Never. Ever. No Chance! In law this is called conscious avoidance. You know that I hope since you went to law school
|
|
|
Post by rj on Jan 13, 2013 18:07:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by playa on Jan 13, 2013 18:09:31 GMT -5
rj is someone who wants a clear answer from teeace who said no about a dozen times and rj is not receptive to the not so subtle rejection rj, no more posting on this thread. You have not contributed to the essence of this thread. I am contacting the moderator asap! Hey peeps, have a nice week. Got to go!
|
|
|
Post by rj on Jan 13, 2013 18:09:36 GMT -5
Scratch that, more like no chance.
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jan 13, 2013 18:10:26 GMT -5
You can't subtract. I love it when you go into ignore the facts mode. It shows a lot. Continuos acceleration is bullshit and proven false by AMM3D. Continuous acceleration is Kelvin's turd in his own pocket right now since he came up with this lame idea strictly from video. What does the rate of rotation from midway down UNTIL impact have to do with what happens AFTER impact? Ask Kelvin. He claims it doesn't slow down.
|
|
|
Post by rj on Jan 13, 2013 18:12:13 GMT -5
rj is someone who wants a clear answer from teeace who said no about a dozen times and rj is not receptive to the not so subtle rejection rj, no more posting on this thread. You have not contributed to the essence of this thread. I am contacting the moderator asap! I asked and he didn't want to give an answer and that's all folks. I didn't ask a dozen times and Tapio didn't refuse a dozen times Dave. Don't bother with the moderator I already sent a p.m. to him.
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jan 13, 2013 18:13:19 GMT -5
Also, this: Kelvin and Jeffy never suggested bracing or stalling of the hip rotation (as I have conceded the use of hip acceleration around impact could be more clear or accurate) But, BMan never discouraged hip bracing or stalling. He has shown many examples of good players doing just that. On this issue alone, K/J is vastly different from BM. In my opinion, BM is gradually and insidiously coming out of his old position, owing to K's influence. (shit, if one reads K's stuff to gleam from it, something will eventually rub off, or is it rob off? ) Pretty soon, he will feel comfortable enough to say: I never taught hip bracing and stalling. Never. Ever. No Chance! In law this is called conscious avoidance. You know that I hope since you went to law school Brian wanted me to accelerate faster in my last lesson. He teaches to each student. I guess if someone is spinning out with their hips and an instructor told them to slow their hips down that would be wrong. I know you understand the words res ipsa.
|
|
|
Post by rj on Jan 13, 2013 18:13:26 GMT -5
rj is someone who wants a clear answer from teeace who said no about a dozen times and rj is not receptive to the not so subtle rejection rj, no more posting on this thread. You have not contributed to the essence of this thread. I am contacting the moderator asap! Hey peeps, have a nice week. Got to go! Say hi to mom, Dave.
|
|
|
Post by jeffy on Jan 13, 2013 18:16:07 GMT -5
What does the rate of rotation from midway down UNTIL impact have to do with what happens AFTER impact? Ask Kelvin. He claims it doesn't slow down. He doesn't? Show me where he wrote that. BTW, you're not getting off the hook so easy just by changing the subject: since that Motion Reality of Jamie data ENDED AT IMPACT, how could it give any rate of rotation data POST-impact? How could you ever think I was talking about a post-impact rate of rotation?
|
|
|
Post by jeffy on Jan 13, 2013 18:19:27 GMT -5
The AMM3D hip rotation data is pretty much the same as the Motion Reality hip rotation data. Cheetham just doesn't know how to process it. He's the fool in this story.
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jan 13, 2013 18:21:57 GMT -5
Ask Kelvin. He claims it doesn't slow down. He doesn't? Show me where he wrote that. BTW, you're not getting off the hook so easy just by changing the subject: since that Motion Reality of Jamie data ENDED AT IMPACT, how could it give any rate of rotation data POST-impact? How could you ever think I was talking about a post-impact rate of rotation? In true Jeffy fasion, GO READ YOUR POSTS! The pelvis is either accelerating, stagnant or declerating. Your homey claims Jeffy is accelerating his pelvis into impact. I really could care less about post-impact. Your analysis shows the pelvis speeding up into impact. Therefore, they aren't slowing down post impact (unless you live in Jeffy land where laws of physics can be invented at will). Are you now going to admit the pelvis significantly slows down before impact for Jamie? Probably not.
|
|
|
Post by cwdlaw223 on Jan 13, 2013 18:22:42 GMT -5
The AMM3D hip rotation data is pretty much the same as the Motion Reality hip rotation data. Cheetham just doesn't know how to process it. He's the fool in this story. We all know that you certainly can't be the fool. Your stuff is peer reviewed and constantly tested. ;D ;D ;D
|
|